Homeopathy Quack

Question

Is homeopathy quack

According to quack busters. Their main attention is directed on alternative medicine and often directly homeopathy. Their argument is that a great deal of mainstream science have not accepted homeopathy, their perception is that homeopathic dilutions are placebos, this perception is predominantly based on assuming high dilutions could not work physically and on clinical trials which were often based on doubtful methods not accepted by homeopathy therefore making those trials highly doubtful. Scientific research on this area is contradictory, there are also many studies proving homeopathy works. By the way, science copies homeopathy when making certain medicines based on similarity, directly proving the effectiveness of the law of similars. Homeopathy is based on a long history of empiricism. Millions of people have experienced the active work of homeopathic medicine. That science has not given a rational explanation on dilutions does not mean there doesn't exist one. We have a strong hypothesis based on relativity making a strong case if you're willing to investigate it. See evidence of homeopathy.

 

Related definitions:

Alternative medicine
Allopathy
Antipathy
Avogadro constant
Biology
Classical homeopathy
Clinical homeopathy
Complex homeopathy
Diagnosis
Dilation
Dilution
Disease
Dynamis
Dynamization
Effective
Empiric
Evidence-based medicine
General relativity
Health
Herbs
Homeopathic dose
Homeopathy
Homeotherapy
Imponderables
Isopathy
Law of infinitesimals
Law of similars
Mainstream science
Materia Medica Pura
Naturopathy
Newton's third law
Organon
Phytotherapy
Placebo
Posology
Potentiation
Principle of relativity
Protoscience
Proving, provings
Pseudoscience
Relativity
Relativity theory
Science
Simillimum
Special relativity
Stem Cells
Toxicology